手术室用过的拭子的电子计数——在诺沃梅斯托综合医 院试用“SC 智能推车”设备

Zoran Preveden, Lovro Bobic, Klemen Bedencic*
诺沃梅斯托总医院骨科创伤科

摘要

尽管外科技术有所进步，但手术后体内残留的外科材料，包括最常被遗忘的外科拭子，仍然是一个相当大
的问题。除了人工计数外，近年来还引入了电子计数。这带来了一定的优势。在这项试点研究中，与斯洛文尼亚特
尔博夫列的 Smart OR d.o.o. 公司合作，在斯洛文尼亚 SB 诺沃梅斯托综合医院实验性地引入了电子计数。“SC 智能
推车”是一种用于电子计数的特殊设备，在各种外科专业的 90 个主要手术中使用，同时进行传统计数。我们记录了
手术团队的工作流程、计数拭子所需的净时间以及使用和不使用该设备时的错误。尽管两种计数方法都没有出错，
但时间分析显示，使用该设备的工作速度更快，团队成员报告工作量减少。使用该设备进行计数可以提高手术室的
透明度。审判没有记录电子计票的任何负面后果。事实证明，使用 SC 智能推车进行电子计数是传统人工计数的一种
安全有效的替代方案，具有其他几个优点：团队工作量更低，工作流程更快，患者安全性更高，手术室组织效率更高。

关键词

Swab 计数；手术室安全；机器计数

参考

[1] Porter, R (2001). The Cambridge illustrated history

of medicine. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-

00252-4. p 30-45.

[2] Dippolito A, Braslow BM, Lombardo G et al. How

David beat Goliath: history of physicians fighting frivolous

lawsuits. OPUS 12 Scientist 2008; 2: 1–8.

[3] Department of Health. The ‘Never Events’ List

2011/12. London: DH; 2011.

[4] Astrop A, van der Merwe T, Muller M., Standards

for the management of swabs, needles and instruments in the

operating theatre., Curationis. 1996 Dec; 19 (4): 2-6.

[5] Cima RR, Kollengode A, Garnatz J et al. Incidence

and characteristics of potential and actual retained foreign

object events in surgical patients. J Am Coll Surg 2008; 207:

80–87.

[6] Egorova NN, Moskowitz A, Gelijns A et al.

Managing the prevention of retaine surgical instruments:

what is the value of counting? Ann Surg 2008; 247: 13–18.

[7] Hariharan D, Lobo DN. Retained surgical sponges,

needles and instruments. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2013; 95 (2):

87–92.

[8] Wan W, Le T, Riskin L, Macario A. Improving

safety in the operating room: a systematic literature review

of retained surgical sponges. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2009;

22: 207–14.

[9] Christian CK, Gustafson ML, Roth EM et al. A

prospective study of patient safety in the operating room.

Surgery 2006; 139: 159–173.

[10] Rashkovska, Aleksandra & Depolli, Matjaž &

Tomašić, Ivan & Avbelj, Viktor & Trobec, Roman. (2020).

Medical-Grade ECG Sensor for Long-Term Monitoring.

Sensors. 2020. 1695. 10.3390/s20061695.

[11] Cima RR, Kollengode A, Storsveen AS, Weisbrod

CA, Deschamps C, Koch MB, Moore D, Pool SR. A

multidisciplinary team approach to retained foreign objects.

Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2009 Mar; 35 (3): 123-32.

[12] Macario A, Morris D, Morris S. Initial clinical

evaluation of a handheld device for detecting retained

surgical gauze sponges using radiofrequency identification

technology. Arch Surg. 2006 Jul; 141 (7): 659-62.

[13] Greenberg CC, Diaz-Flores R, Lipsitz SR,

Regenbogen SE, Mulholland L, Mearn F, Rao S, Toidze

T, Gawande AA. Barcoding surgical sponges to improve

safety: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2008 Apr;

247 (4): 612-6.