学校性健康教育政策的作用：综述
摘要
的禁欲教育（AOE）项目在推迟开始性行为或降低青少年怀孕率方面收效甚微。相反，综合性教育（CSE）项目显
示了降低青少年怀孕和延迟开始性行为的能力。然而，联邦基金继续主要支持AOE项目，大多数州也支持学校AOE
项目，而不是 CSE。这次审查的目的是审查性健康教育政策的作用，因为性健康教育可以对青少年的健康和福祉产
生影响。该综述为学校健康护理机构提供了信息，以帮助他们教育家长和管理人员了解AOE的负面影响，以便他们
可以倡导政策改变。
关键词
全文:
PDF参考
[1]Advocates for Youth. (2012). Science & success:
Programs that work to prevent teen pregnancy, HIV, and
sexually transmitted infections. Retrieved from: http://
www.advocatesforyouth.org/ storage/advfy/documents/
thirdeditionexecutivesummary.pdf
[2]Baker, J. O., Smith, K. K., & Stoss, Y. A. (2015).
Theism, secularism, and sexual education in the United
States. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 12, 236–247.
doi:10.1007/s1317801501878
[3]Carr, J. B., & Packham, A. (2017). The effects of statemandated abstinence-based sex education on teen health
outcomes. Health Economics, 26, 403–420. doi:10.1002/
hec.3315
[4]Center for Disease Control. (2014). School health
profiles characteristics of health programs among secondary
schools. Retrieved from https://cdc.gov/healthyyouth/data/
profiles
[5]Center for Disease Control. (2015). New findings from
CDC survey suggest too few schools teach prevention of HIV,
STDs, pregnancy. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/
news room/2015/nhpc-press-release-schools-teachingprevention.html
[6]Center for Disease Control. (2017). 2016 Sexually
transmitted diseases surveillance. Retrieved from https://www.
cdc.gov/std/ stats16/tables/StateRankingTables.pdf
[7]Center for Disease Control. (2018). Teen birth rate
by state-2016. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/
pressroom/sosmap/teen-births/teenbirths.htm
[8]Chevrette, M., & Abenhaim, H. A. (2015). Do statebased policies have an impact on teen birth rates and teen
abortion rates in the United States? Journal of Pediatric
Gynecology, 28, 354–361. doi:10.1016/j.jpag.2014.10.006
[9]Constantine, N. A., Jerman, P., & Huang, A. X. (2007).
California parents’ preferences and beliefs regarding schoolbased sex education policy. Perspectives on Sexual and
Reproductive Health, 39, 167–175. doi:10.1363/3916707
[10]Donovan, M. K. (2017). The looming threat to sex
education: A resurgence of federal funding for abstinence.
Guttmacher Policy Review, 20, 44–47. Retrieved from https://
guttmacher.org/gpr/2017/03/looming-threat-sex-educationresurgance-federalfunding- abstinence-only-programs
[11]Eisenberg, M. E., Bernat, D. H., Bearinger, L. H., &
Resnick, M. D. (2008). Support for comprehensive sexuality
education: Perspectives from parents of school-age youth.
Journal of Adolescent Health, 42, 352–359. doi:10.1016/
j.jadohealth. 2007.09.019
[12]Eisenberg, M. E., Bernat, D. H., Bearinger, L. H.,
& Resnick, M. D. (2009). Condom provision and education
in Minnesota public schools: A telephone survey of parents.
Journal of School Health, 79, 416–424. doi:10.1111/j.1746-
1561.2009.00429.x
[13]Guttmacher Institute. (2017, October 1). Sex and HIV
education. Retrieved from https://www.guttmacher.org/statepolicy/explore/sex-and-hiv-education
[14]Kantor, L., & Levitz, N. (2017). Parents’ views
on sex education in schools: How much do Democrats and
Republicans agree? PLoS One, 12, 1–9. doi:10.3171/journal.
pone.0-180250
[15]Lerner, J. E., & Hawkins, R. L. (2016). Welfare,
liberty, and security for all? U.S. sex education policy and
the 1996 Title V Section 510 of the Social Security Act.
Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45, 1027–1038. doi:10.1007/
s1050801607315
[16]Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. (2017).
Abstinenceonly-until-marriage policies and programs: An
updated position paper of the society for adolescent health
and medicine. Journal of Adolescent Health, 61, 400–403.
doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth. 2017.0-6.001
[17]Yang, Z., & Gaydos, L. M. (2010). Reasons for and
challenged of recent increases in teen birth rates: A study of
family planning service policies and demographic changes at
state level. Journal of Adolescent Health, 46, 517–524.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12361/2661-3700-04-01-71
Refbacks
- 当前没有refback。
数据库合作单位
