螺旋上升法与菲律宾初中 10 年级学生的学习成绩

Asuncion T. Manalo¹, Alberto D. Yazon²
1、奥多德主教高中
2、拉古纳州立理工大学洛斯巴诺斯校区

摘要

本项研究旨在确定使用螺旋上升法与学校 10 年级学生的英语、科学和数学学业成绩的关系。研究中有 346 名教 师受访者和 1022 名学生受访者来自拉古纳的三个城市学校分部。数据通过经过验证和可靠性测试的调查问卷收集。使用频率、 百分比、平均值、标准偏差、Pearson r、ANOVA 和 t 检验对数据进行分析。结果表明，螺旋上升法与学生的科学和数学成绩 之间存在显著的关系。教师-受访者在实施螺旋上升法时使用的策略和教学材料与学生的学业成绩也有显著的关系。根据年龄 分组时，教师对螺旋式上升教学法的评估在教学材料方面有显著差异。根据服务年限分组时，在策略方面有显著差异。此外， 专业分组中教师对螺旋式上升法的评估在教学法、教学材料和评估方面存在显著差异。研究者建议在 LAC 会议上提出主题， 以解决实施螺旋推进法中的问题和困难，并激励教师制定项目提案并实施，以帮助提高 ENSCIMA 学生的学业成绩。

关键词

螺旋上升法；内容标准；教学法；学习评估

参考

[1] Casil, C. ( 2018) Assessment on the Spiral Progression of the K to 12 Curriculum Western Mindanao State University. [2] Clark, S. (2010) Jerome Bruner Teaching – Learning and Spiral Curriculum, Community and Thought in Education. Retrieved from. http://Spiral Progression Approach.jerome–bruner-teaching –learning–and spiral - curriculum 2.pdf [3] De Dios, A. (2013). Spiral Curriculum: When and How? Redundant versus Progressive? Retrieved from: http://www.philippinesbasiceducation.us/2013/05/spiral-curriculum-when-and-how.html#ixzz48IUWrBDt [4] DepEd Order 31 s. 2012 “Policy Guidelines on the Implementation of the Grade 1 to 10 of the K to12Drachster, H. Kirschner, P.A.(2012) Learner Characteristic. In Seel N. M (eds) Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning, Springer, Boston, MA [5] Dyer, J. E., & Osborne, E. W. (1995). Effects of teaching Approach on Achievement of Agricultural Education Students with varying Learning Styles. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual National Agricultural EducationResourch Meeting, 22,260-271 [6] Edomwonyi-Out, L., & Avaa, A. (2011). The Challenge of Effective Teaching of Chemistry: A Case Study. Leonardo Electronic Journal of Practices and Technologies 18, 1-8. [7] Ferido, M. (2013). The Spiral Progression Approach in Science http://www.ceap.org.ph/upload/download/20137/137150183_1.pdf [8] Haeusler, C. (2013). Examining The Curriculum And Assessment Framework Of The Australian Curriculum: Science. [9] Inan, F. & Lowther D. (2010): Factors affecting technology integration in K – 12 Classroom A path Model.Educational Technology research and Development [10] Lacanilao, F. (2012). A Critique of Some Commentaries on the Philippine K-12 Program. Retrieved from http://josecarilloforum.com/forum/index.php?topic=2326. [11] Mantiza, M (2013) Spiral Progression in Science.https://www.slideshare net BESPF/Spiral Progression in Science. [12] Martin, B.(2009). Obstacles to Academic Integrity. Proceedings of the 3 Asia Pacifific Conference ofEducational Integrity:CreatingaCulture of Integrity University of South Australia[13] Montebon, D. (2014). K-12 Science Program in the Philippines: Student Perception on its Implementation. International Journal of Education and Research 2(12), 153-164 [14] Mushtag, I. & Khan, S ( 2012) Factors Affecting Student’s Academic Performance. Global Journal of Management and Business Research 12, 16-22 [15] Orbe, J. R., Espinosa, A. A., & Datukan, J. T. (2018). Teaching Chemistry in Spiral Progression Approach: Lessons from Science Teachers in the Philippines. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43 (4). http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2018v43n4.2 [16] Palardy, G. J., & Rumberger, R. W. (2008). Teacher Effectiveness in First Grade: The Importance of Background Qualifications, Attitudes, Instructional Practices for Student Learning. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30, 111-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0162373708317680 [17] Resurreccion, J. A., & Adanza, J. (2015). Spiral Progression Approach in Teaching Science in Selected Private andPublic Schools in Cavite. Presented at the DLSU Research Congress 2015 De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines March 2-4, 2015 Spiral. Proceedings of the DLSU Research Congress Vol. 3 2015. [18] Samala, H. R (2017) Spiral Progression Approach in Teaching Science: A Case Study Article (PDF Available) June 2018 with 2,184 Reads DOI: 10.18502/kss.v3i6.2404 [19] Sanchez JM. Integrated macro-micro-symbolic approach in teaching secondary Chemistry. Kimika. 2017; 28 (2), 22-29. DOI: 10.26534/kimika. v28i2.22-29 [20] Snider, VE. & Crawford D.(2204) Mathematics In N. E. Marchand–Montella T. A. Slocum, S R C Martella (eds) Introduction to Direct Instruction pp 206-249.Boston; Ally & Bacon. [21] Tan, M.(2012) Spiral Progression Approach to teaching and learning University of the Philippines, Diliman, Quezon City, National Institute for Science and Mathematics Education development https//www.ceap.org.phi upload download 201101606141386 [22] Valin, E.& Janer, S (2019) Spiral Progression Approach in Teaching Science and Computing Volume 9 Issue No. 3 March 2019.