The Comparative Analysis of Discourse of Sino-American Diplomatic Languages

龚 抗抗
哈尔滨师范大学 黑龙江省哈尔滨市 150025

摘要

With the frequent diplomatic activities, diplomatic language has extremely important significance for diplomacy. Discourse analysis provides a unique perspective and a direction for the study of international relations. Through a comparative study of official discourse, it helps to understand the official discourse of both parties more quickly and accurately, avoid misunderstandings, and increase the effectiveness of communication.

关键词

discourse analysis; diplomacy; differences

参考

[1]Chouliaraki, L. (2000).Political Discourse in the News [J]. Discourse and Society, 11, 293-314. [2]Fairclough. (1989). Language and Power [M]. London: Longman. [3]Graber. (2003). Styles of Image Management During Crises [J], Discourse & Society, 14, 539-557. [4]Van Dijk, T.A.(2009). Society and Discourse [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [5]Wodak, R. (1989). Language, Power and Ideology: Studies in Political Discourse [M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. [6]Yule, G. (2010). The Study of Language [M]. New York: Cambridge University. [7]程大为.浅谈“亲、诚、惠、容”周边外交理念[J].光明日报, 2015, 3：79-81. [8]段士平.复杂系统理论框架下中国大学生英语口语模糊限制语块使用研究[J].外语界, 2015, 6：45-53.. [9]苗兴伟.批评话语分析的系统功能语言学路径[J].山东外语教学, 2016, 6：10-17. [10]朱桂生,黄建滨.美国主流媒体视野中的中国“一带一路”战略[J].新闻界, 2016, 17：58-64.