肺结核病原位病理检测技术的应用价值

李 红娜, 宋 旭东
华北理工大学 河北唐山 063000

摘要

目前检测结核分枝杆菌常用的诊断方法主要包括细菌学检查、免疫学检查及分子生物学检查。但是，仍然有一些菌阴性肺结核病病人漏诊。因此，为提高结核分枝杆菌检出率和减少漏诊，本研究主要讨论近几年常用的原位病理检测技术在早期肺结核病筛查中的诊断价值。

关键词

肺结核病；原位病理诊断技术；结核分枝杆菌

参考

[1]刘彤华.诊断病理学[M].3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2013:241-256.[2]中华医学会结核病学分会,结核病病理学诊断专家共识编写组.中国结核病病理学诊断专家共识[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2017,40(06):419-425.[3]Heemskerk A D, Donovan J,Thu D,et al.Improving the microbiological diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis:A prospective, international,multicentre comparison of conventional and modified Ziehl-Neelsen stain, GeneXpert, and culture of cerebrospinal fluid[J]. J Infect, 2018, 77(6):509-515.[4]齐兴峰,郑智勇.结核分枝杆菌检测技术的研究进展[J].临床与实验病理学杂志,2016, 32(11):1263-1266.[5]Githui W, Kitui F, Juma E S, et al. A comparative study on the reliability of the fluorescence microscopy and Ziehl-Neelsen method in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis[J]. East Afr Med J, 1993, 70: 263-266.[6]Laifangbam S, Singh H L, Singh N B, et al. A comparative study of fluorescent microscopy with Ziehl-Neelsen staining and culture for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis[J]. Kathmandu Univ Med J(KUMJ),2009,7(27):226-230.[7]Santin M, Munoz L, Rigau D. Interferon-gamma release assays for the diagnosis of tuberculosis and tuberculosis infection in HIV-infected adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. PLoS One, 2012, 7(3):32482.[8]金淑芳. 结核病实验室诊断方法的研究进展[J].医学理论与实践,2014, 27(7):874-876. [9] Wu R I, Mark E J, Hunt J L. Staining for acid-fast bacilli in surgical pathology: practice patterns and variations[J]. Hum Pathol, 2012, 43(11): 1845-1851.[10]Malen H, Softeland T, Wiker H G. Antigen analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv culture filtrate proteins[J]. Scand J Immunol, 2008,67(3):245-252.[11]Che N, Qu Y, Zhang C, et al. Double staining of bacilli and antigen Ag85B improves the accuracy of the pathological diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis[J]. J Clin Pathol, 2016, 69(7):600-606.[12]Rodriguez-Nunez J, Avelar F J, Marquez F, et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex detected by modified fluorescent in situ hybridization in lymph nodes of clinical samples[J]. J Infect Dev Ctries, 2012, 6(1):58-66.[13]Wang F, Flanagan J, Su N, et al. RNAscope: a novel in situ RNA analysis platform for formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues[J]. J Mol Diagn, 2012, 14(1):22-29.[14]Wang H, Wang M X, Su N, et al. RNAscope for in situ detection of transcriptionally active human papillomavirus in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma[J]. J Vis Exp, 2014(85).[15]Roe C J, Siddiqui M T, Lawson D, et al. RNA In Situ Hybridization for Epstein-Barr Virus and Cytomegalovirus: Comparison With In Situ Hybridization and Immunohistochemistry[J]. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol, 2019, 27(2):155-159.[16]Cai Y, Wang D, Zhou L, et al. Application of RNAscope technology to studying the infection dynamics of a Chinese porcine epidemic diarrhea virus variant strain BJ2011C in neonatal piglets[J]. Vet Microbiol, 2019, 235:220-228.[17]Bonifacio J, Schmolke M. Visualization of Respiratory Commensal Bacteria in Context of Their Natural Host Environment[J]. Front Microbiol, 2021, 12:678389.[18]Lossi L, Gambino G, Salio C, et al. Direct in situ rt-PCR[J]. Methods Mol Biol, 2011, 789:111-126.