急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并高血栓负荷患者延迟支架术与直接支架术的对比分析

矫 越¹, 周 珊珊²
1、吉林大学第一医院 吉林长春 130021
2、通讯作者吉林大学第一医院 吉林长春 130021

摘要

目的：高血栓负荷是当前引发心血管疾病的重要因素。本文对高血栓负荷的定义、分级进行了介绍，并总结了高血栓负荷形成的危险因素、形成机制、STEMI介入治疗策略、延期治疗术的实施，以及适应症，对该病症进行了综合性的阐述。

关键词

高血栓负荷；心肌梗死；延迟支架术

参考

[1《]中国心血管病报告 2017》概要［J］. 中国循环杂志，2018，-33（1）：1-8. [2]Harper RW. Pre-hospital thrombolysis rather than primary percutaneous intervention is the treatment of choice for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction presenting early after the onset of symptoms [J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2010, 3(10):1093 -1094. [3]Sun B, Liu J, Yin H, Yang S, Liu Z, Chen T, Li J, Guo C, Jiang Z. Delayed vs. immediate stenting in STEMI with a high thrombus burden: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Herz. 2019 Dec;44(8):726-734. [4]Vora AN, Holmes DN, Rokos I, et al. Fibrinolysis use among patients requiring interhospital transfer for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction care: a report from the US National Cardiovascular Data Registry[J]. JAMA Intern Med, 2015,175(2):207-215. [5]Person TA,Mensah GA,Alexander RW,el al.Markers of inflammation and cardiovascular disease: application to clinical and public health practice: A statement for healthcare professionals from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American Heart Association[J].Circulation .2003,107(3):499-511. [6]Celik T,Lyisoy A,Yuksel UC,et al.The impact of admission C-reactive protein levels on the development of no-reflow phenomenon after primary PCI in patients with acute myocardial infarction: the role of inflammation [J].lnt J Caniiol,2009,136(1)：86-88. [7]Li DB，Hua Q，Liu Z，el al.Association between inflammatory mediators and angiographic morphologic features indicating thrombus formation in patients with acute myocardial infarction[J]. Chin Med J(Engl),2009, 122(15):1738-1742. [8]Vlaar PJ, Svilaas T, van der Horst IC et al Cardiac death and reinfarction after 1 year in the thrombus aspiration during percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction study (TAPAS): a 1-year follow-up study. Lancet ，2008，371:1915–1920 [9]JolicoeurEM, Tanguay JF From primary to secondary percutaneous coronary inter vention: the emerging concept of early mechanical reperfusion with delayed facilitated stenting when earlier may not be better. Can J Cardiol，2011， 27:529–533. [10]GuagliumiG,CostaMA,SirbuV，etal. Strut coverage and late malapposition with paclitaxel-eluting stents compared with bare metal stents in acute myocardial infarction: optical coherence tomography substudy of the harmonizing outcomes with revascularization and stents in acute myocardial infarction (HORIZONSAMI) trial. Circulation，2011，123:274–281. [11]Carrick D, Oldroyd KG, McEntegart M et al .Arandomized trial of deferred stenting versus immediate stenting to prevent no or slow-reflflow in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (DEFER-STEMI). J Am Coll Cardiol，2014，63:2088–2098. [12]Marquis-Gravel G, Jolicoeur EM . The value of deferred stenting in acute myocardial infarction: can minimalist immediate mechanical intervention do it all? Can J Cardiol，2016，32:935–937. [13]De Maria GL,Alkhalil M,Oikonomou EK et al .Role of deferred stenting in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary inter vention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Inter v Cardiol ，2017，30:264–273. [14]Lee JM, Rhee TM, Chang H et al . Deferred versus conventional stent implantationinpatients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: an updated meta-analysis of 10 studies. Int J Cardiol ，2017，230:509–517.