机器人操作界面交互信息可视化仿真研究

谢 斌
大连职业技术学院智能制造学院

摘要

现在的机器人操作信息接口面临着很多不合理的部分，如操作界面交互信息处理速度慢，机器人控制准确度低，针对这个现象提出了机器人操作界面交互信息可视化仿真研究。人机操作界面存在交互信息包括操纵对象和信息点，整合交互信息单元，运用知识元处理机器人操作界面互动信息获得信息融合集，对交互信息进行加工，处理。信息融合集集合了操控者的多方面基本信息，计算了度量信息的基本要素，运用算法计算熵值，并结合不同的权重值，运用加权值相加对融合值进行综合计算。将经过加权权重处理后的值放入到控制器进行运算，计算各种偏差，省略值和补充项，调节所有参数操控机器人。并根据机器人操作界面交互信息的实时情况不断调整各种参数，对新场景不断适应。本篇文章研究了机器人操作界面交互信息可视化仿真原理和内容，阐述了机器人操作界面交互信息可视化仿真对提高交互便利性的突出表现。运用数据说明，机器人操作界面交互信息可视化仿真在可视化方面具有显著成果，操控精准度高。

关键词

机器人操作，操作界面，交互信息，可视化仿真

参考

[1]Maksimenko O L , Evgrafova Y A . Inherent Features and the Root Process of the Screen Text as the Audio- Visual Simulation of Reality[J]. Concept Philosophy Religion Culture, 2020, 4(4):46-56.[2]Sanjoyo B A , Hariadi M , Purnomo M H . Stable Algorithm Based On Lax-Friedrichs Scheme for Visual Simulation of Shallow Water[J]. EMITTER International Journal of Engineering Technology, 2020, 8(1):19-34.[3] Yu M , Osadskaya A , Shcherbakov S . Methodological Support of Additional Professional Education: Simulation and Labor Costs Estimation[J]. Bulletin of Science and Practice, 2021, 7(1):340-349.[4] Guevremont M , Hammad A . Ontology for Linking Delay Claims with 4D Simulation to Analyze Effects-Causes and Responsibilities[J]. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 2021, 13(4):04521024-04521024.[5]Ahmed S Z , Jensen J , Weidner C A , et al. Quantum composer: A programmable quantum visualization and simulation tool for education and research[J]. American Journal of Physics, 2021, 89(3):307-316.[6] Kim D , Han S , Kim T , et al. Design of a Sensitive Balloon Sensor for Safe Human–Robot Interaction[J]. Sensors, 2021, 21(6):2163-2163.[7] Podpora M , Gardecki A , Beniak R , et al. Human Interaction Smart Subsystem—Extending Speech-Based Human-Robot Interaction Systems with an Implementation of External Smart Sensors[J]. Sensors, 2020, 20(8):2376-2376.[8] H Su, Lallo A D , Murphy R R , et al. Physical human–robot interaction for clinical care in infectious environments[J]. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2021, 3(3):184-186.[9] Asemi A , Ko A , Nowkarizi M . Intelligent libraries: a review on expert systems, artificial intelligence, and robot[J]. Library Hi Tech, 2020, 26(June):1-23.[10] Tao H , Rahman M A , Jing W , et al. Interaction modeling and classification scheme for augmenting the response accuracy of human-robot interaction systems[J]. Work, 2021, 68(5):1-10.[11] Iwasaki M , Ikeda M , Kawamura T , et al. State-Transition Modeling of Human–Robot Interaction for Easy Crowdsourced Robot Control[J]. Sensors, 2020, 20(22):6529-6529.[12] Permatasari D A , Fakhrurroja H , Machbub C . Human-Robot Interaction Based on Dialog Management Using Sentence Similarity Comparison Method[J]. International Journal on Advanced Science Engineering and Information Technology, 2020, 10(5):1881-1881.[13] Badr A A , Karim A . A Review on Voice-based Interface for Human-Robot Interaction[J]. Iraqi Journal for Electrical And Electronic Engineering, 2020, 16(2):91-102.[14] Hsieh W F , Sato-Shimokawara E , Yamaguchi T . Investigation of Robot Expression Style in Human-Robot Interaction[J]. Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics, 2020, 32(1):224-235.[15] Romano D , Bloemberg J , Tannous M , et al. Impact of Aging and Cognitive Mechanisms on High-Speed Motor Activation Patterns: Evidence From an Orthoptera-Robot Interaction[J]. IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics, 2020, 2(2):292-296.[16] Filippini C , Perpetuini D , Cardone D , et al. Thermal Infrared Imaging-Based Affective Computing and Its Application to Facilitate Human Robot Interaction: A Review[J]. Applied Sciences, 2020, 10(8):2924-2924.