高中生语言学习动机的相关性

Steve Corsino¹, Rex Lim², Kristine Reyes³
1、菲律宾圣玛丽班萨兰学院
2、菲律宾无原罪大学
3、菲律宾南达沃商船学院

摘要

本研究旨在确定语言教师的建构主义学习环境管理技能和创造力培养行为与高中生英语学习动机之间的显着 关系。它使用定量方法并采用相关研究设计。采用分层随机抽样技术从位于南达沃的学校的 319 名高中生中收集数据。 研究结果表明，在建构主义学习环境中，管理技能、学与教是教师表现出的主要技能，其次是时间利用和评估，而关 系建立是表现最低的技能。此外，在培养创造力的行为中，整合是表现的最高指标，其次是独立性和问题。此外，英 语学习动机的最高水平是外在调节，其次是内在动机和内向调节。最后，建构主义学习环境管理技能和语言教师的创 造力培养行为显着预测学生的英语学习动机。

关键词

建构主义学习环境管理技能;培养创造力的行为;英语学习动机;定量方法;描述相关设计;菲律宾

参考

[1] Arthur, D. Y. (2019). Effect of the constructivist teaching method, undergraduate students' statistics self-concept and other psychological constructs in mediating their motivation for learning statistics. African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Sciences, 15(1), 129-142.

[2] Bereczki, E. O., & Kárpáti, A. (2018). Teachers’ beliefs about creativity and its nurture: A systematic review of the recent research literature. Educational Research Review, 23, 25-56.

[3] Birgili, B., Seggie, F. N., & Oğuz, E. (2021). The trends and outcomes of flipped learning research between 2012 and 2018: A descriptive content analysis. Journal of Computers in Education, 1-30. [4] Burton, P. (2010). Creativity in Hong Kong schools. World Englishes, 29(4), 493-507.

[5] Cetin-Dindar, A. (2015). Student motivation in the constructivist learning environment. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(2), 233-247.

[6] Cetin-Dindar, A., & Geban, O. (2015). Adaptation of the Science Motivation Scale into Turkish and Chemistry: Analysis of Validity. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 5(1), 2015, 19-38. [7] Comanaru,R.,&Noels,K.A. (2009). Self-determina tion, motivation, and the learning of Chinese as a herita ge language. Canadian Modern Language Review, 66(1), 131-158.

[8] DeVries, R., & Zan, B. (2005). A constructivist perspective on the role of the sociomoral atmosphere in promoting children's development. In C. T. Fosnot (Ed.), Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice (2nd ed.132–149). New York: Teachers College.

[9] Dishke-Hondzel, C. M. (2013). Fostering Creativity: Ontario Teachers' Perceptions, Strategies, and Experiences. Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 1173.https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/1173 [10] Dornyei, Z. (2001). Teaching and ResearchingMotivation. England: Pearson Education Limited.

[11] Dörnyei, Z., & Csizér, K. (1998). Ten commandments for motivating language learners: Results of an empirical study. Language teaching research, 2(3), 203-229.

[12] Duffy, G. G., Miller, S., Parsons, S., & Meloth, M. (2009). Teachers as metacognitive professionals. Handbook of metacognition in education, 252-268.

[13] Given, L. M. (Ed.). (2008). The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Sage publications.

[14] Ghasemi, F., Rastegar, A., Jahromi, R. G., & Marvdashti, R. R. (2011). The relationship between creativity and achievement motivation with high school students' entrepreneurship. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 1291-1296.

[15] Gu, M. (2009). The Discursive Construction of Second Language Learners' Motivation: A Multi-Level Perspective. UK: Peter Lang.

[16] Hoffman, B. (2015). Motivation for learning and performance. Academic Press.

[17] Huitt, W. (2001). Motivation to Learn: an Overview. http://chiron.valdosta.edu/whuitt/col/motivation/motivate.ht ml

[18] Kanfer, R., Frese, M., & Johnson, R. E. (2017). Motivation related to work: A century of progress. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 338.

[19] Kaya, Z., & Tüfekçi, S. (2008). The effect of the constructivist approach on achievement. The Journal of the Industrial Arts Education Faculty of Gazi University, 23, 79–90.

[20] Kaycheng, S & Boylan, M. (2015). Creativity fostering teacher behaviour around the world: Annotations of studies using the CFTIndex. Cogent Education. 2. 1034494. 10.1080/2331186X.2015.1034494. [21] Loyens, S. M. M., & Gijbels, D. (2008). Understanding the effects of constructivist learning environments: Introducing a multi-directional approach. Instructional Science, 36 (5/6), 351–357. [22] Maheshwari, G., & Thomas, S. (2017). An Analysis of the Effectiveness of the Constructivist Approach in Teaching Business Statistics. Informing Science, 20.

[23] Parilah, M. S. (2002). Attitude, motivation and individual characteristics as variables of L2 acquisition. Readings in English language teaching (ELT), 116-123.

[24] Pon, N. (2001). Constructivism in the secondary mathematics classroom. EGallery, 3 (2). Retrieved Jan 5, 2012, from http://www.ucalgary.ca/~egallery

[25] Raosoft (2004) Raosoft Sample Size Calculator. Raosoft, Inc., Seattle. http://www.raosoft.com/samplesize. html

[26] Robinson, K. (2011). Out of our minds: Learning to be creative. John Wiley & Sons.

[27] Shafaei, A. & Nejati, M. (2008). Global Practices of Language Teaching: Proceedings of the 2008 International Online Language Conference. New York: Universal-Publishers.

[28] Thao, T. Q., & Long, N. C. H. (2020). The use of self-regulated language learning strategies among Vietnamese English-majored freshmen: A case study. VNU Journal of Science: Education Research, 36(1).

[29] Thongma, S., Rany S., Mohamad J. Z. I., and Leong, L. M. (2013). Factors Cause Students Low English Language Learning: A Case Study in the National University of Laos. International Journal of English Language Education, 1, 179-192.

[30] Wang, H. C., & Cheng, Y. S. (2016). Dissecting language creativity: English proficiency, creativity, and creativity motivation as predictors in EFL learners’ metaphoric creativity. Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts, 10(2), 205.

[31] Yildirim, M. C. (2009). Evaluating the instructional supervision practices at primary schools in terms of constructivist learning paradigm principles. Unpublished M. Sc. Thesis, Malatya: Inonu University, Institute of Social Science.

[32] Yildirim, I., & Jacobs, R. A. (2013). Transfer of object category knowledge across visual and haptic modalities: Experimental and computational studies. Cognition, 126(2), 135-148.